Model comparison
Qwen1.5-7B vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen1.5-7B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 64.5 to 29.8.
- Qwen1.5-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3.7 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 45.0 |
| Released | 2024-02-04 | 2026-06-02 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.60 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 31.6 (#271), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.1 (#200)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1107 | 1473 |
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |
| SciCode | — | 45.5% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.2 (#130)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |
Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 19.5 (#237), Qwen3.7 Plus: 38.4 (#54)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1066 | 1460 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.8% |
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 24% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 84% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.39 |
Math Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 29.0 (#222), Qwen3.7 Plus: 49.3 (#47)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1080 | 1467 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 34.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 28.2 (#239), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#46)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1055 | 1467 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |
| MMLU | 62.6% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.2 (#30)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1281 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |
Multilingual Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 28.6 (#266), Qwen3.7 Plus: 55.0 (#36)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1058 | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1140 | 1510 |
| LMArena Russian | 1006 | 1457 |
| LMArena French | — | 1471 |
| LMArena German | — | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1411 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1416 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1453 |
Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 54.4 (#276), Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.9 (#49)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1058 | 1439 |
Long Context Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#261), Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#61)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1090 | 1454 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 29.8 (#288), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.5 (#54)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1084 | 1454 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1035 | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1061 | 1459 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen1.5-7B better than Qwen3.7 Plus?
Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen1.5-7B or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?
Qwen3.7 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-7B and Qwen3.7 Plus share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-7B has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.