Model comparison
Qwen1.5-7B vs Qwen3-4B
Qwen1.5-7B and Qwen3-4B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.8 vs 31.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3-4B leads 33.0 to 28.2.
Side by side
| Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3-4B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 31.5 |
| Released | 2024-02-04 | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: 31.6 (#271), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1107 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: —, Qwen3-4B: 27.3 (#94)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 35.7% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Qwen1.5-7B: 19.5 (#237), Qwen3-4B: 18.5 (#264)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1066 | — |
Math Too close to call
Qwen1.5-7B: 29.0 (#222), Qwen3-4B: 28.5 (#228)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 38.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 52.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1080 | — |
Knowledge Qwen3-4B leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 28.2 (#239), Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#198)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 52.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1055 | — |
| MMLU | 62.6% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: 28.6 (#266), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1058 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1140 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1006 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: 54.4 (#276), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1058 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#261), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1090 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: 29.8 (#288), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1084 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1035 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1061 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen1.5-7B better than Qwen3-4B?
Qwen1.5-7B and Qwen3-4B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.8 vs 31.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-7B and Qwen3-4B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-7B has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.