Model comparison
Qwen1.5-7B vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
Qwen1.5-7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Side by side
| Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 29.9 |
| Released | 2024-02-04 | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2.80 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $8.40 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: 32.2 (#276), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1107 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: —, Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 18.6 (#144)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld | — | 5% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Qwen1.5-7B: 20.4 (#240), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 20.7 (#233)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 36% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1065 | — |
Math Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: 31.4 (#224), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1080 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: 28.7 (#243), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1055 | — |
| MMLU | 62.6% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: —, Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 33.5 (#97)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1107 |
| Video-MME | — | 73.5% |
| GeoBench | — | 62% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 33.3% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: 28.5 (#271), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1058 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1141 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1006 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: 54.1 (#281), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1058 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#266), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1090 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: 29.6 (#293), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1035 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1062 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen1.5-7B better than Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct?
Qwen1.5-7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-7B and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-7B has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has 6.