Model comparison
Qwen1.5-32B vs Step 3.7 Flash
Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
StepFunSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Step 3.7 Flash leads 42.9 to 33.0.
Side by side
| Qwen1.5-32B | Step 3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 30.5 | 37.3 |
| Released | 2024-02-04 | 2026-05-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.18 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.11 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 5 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 3.7 Flash leads
Qwen1.5-32B: 31.7 (#282), Step 3.7 Flash: 40.0 (#150)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 40% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 32.3% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1155 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 42% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 694.12 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Qwen1.5-32B: 21.8 (#212), Step 3.7 Flash: 21.6 (#219)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 39.7% |
| CritPt | — | 2.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1130 | — |
Math Step 3.7 Flash leads
Qwen1.5-32B: 33.0 (#207), Step 3.7 Flash: 42.9 (#82)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 68.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1155 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#296), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 30.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1126 | — |
| MMLU | 74.4% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen1.5-32B: 31.4 (#259), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1106 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1177 | — |
| LMArena French | 1101 | — |
| LMArena German | 1058 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1027 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1008 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1073 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1089 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen1.5-32B: 57.7 (#265), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1116 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#246), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1146 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen1.5-32B: 34.2 (#271), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1137 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1140 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen1.5-32B better than Step 3.7 Flash?
Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen1.5-32B or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?
Step 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-32B and Step 3.7 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-32B has 21 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.