Model comparison
Qwen1.5-14B vs Yi-Large
Qwen1.5-14B has enough public results to be ranked (#250); Yi-Large does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Qwen1.5-14B scores higher in 0 categories and Yi-Large in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Yi-Large leads 36.1 to 32.5.
- Qwen1.5-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen1.5-14B | Yi-Large | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 32.1 | 37.6 |
| Released | 2024-02-04 | 2024-05-13 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Yi-Large leads
Qwen1.5-14B: 32.5 (#259), Yi-Large: 36.1 (#201)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.7% |
| LMArena Coding | 1138 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 47.2% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Qwen1.5-14B: 20.5 (#217), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | — |
Math Not comparable
Qwen1.5-14B: 29.9 (#214), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1125 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen1.5-14B: 29.3 (#230), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 68.6% | 79.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1094 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen1.5-14B: 30.8 (#257), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1095 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1147 | — |
| LMArena French | 1115 | — |
| LMArena German | 1043 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1019 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1046 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1085 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen1.5-14B: 57.1 (#266), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1102 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#252), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1113 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#270), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1128 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1091 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1110 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen1.5-14B better than Yi-Large?
Qwen1.5-14B has enough public results to be ranked (#250); Yi-Large does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Qwen1.5-14B or Yi-Large better for coding?
Yi-Large scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 32.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-14B and Yi-Large share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Qwen1.5-14B has 17 scored results on Noometry and Yi-Large has 3.