Model comparison
Qwen1.5-14B vs Wizardlm 13b
Qwen1.5-14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.1 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen1.5-14B scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Qwen1.5-14B leads 30.8 to 27.3.
Side by side
| Qwen1.5-14B | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 32.1 | 30.8 |
| Released | 2024-02-04 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen1.5-14B leads
Qwen1.5-14B: 32.5 (#259), Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1138 | 1035 |
Reasoning Qwen1.5-14B leads
Qwen1.5-14B: 20.5 (#217), Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1018 |
Math Qwen1.5-14B leads
Qwen1.5-14B: 29.9 (#214), Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1125 | 1017 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen1.5-14B: 29.3 (#230), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1094 | — |
| MMLU | 68.6% | — |
Multilingual Qwen1.5-14B leads
Qwen1.5-14B: 30.8 (#257), Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1095 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1147 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1115 | — |
| LMArena German | 1043 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1019 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1046 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1085 | — |
Instruction Following Qwen1.5-14B leads
Qwen1.5-14B: 57.1 (#266), Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1102 | 1049 |
Long Context Qwen1.5-14B leads
Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#252), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1113 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Qwen1.5-14B leads
Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#270), Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1128 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1091 | 1090 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1110 | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen1.5-14B better than Wizardlm 13b?
Qwen1.5-14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.1 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen1.5-14B or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
Qwen1.5-14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.5 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-14B and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-14B has 17 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.