Model comparison
Qwen1.5-14B vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 29.3.
- Qwen1.5-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen1.5-14B | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.1 | 39.5 |
| Released | 2024-02-04 | 2026-07-15 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.03 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.13 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen1.5-14B: 32.5 (#259), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1138 | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Qwen1.5-14B: 20.5 (#217), Qwen3.7 Flash: 27.3 (#108)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 144.62 |
Math Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Qwen1.5-14B: 29.9 (#214), Qwen3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#100)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1125 | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Qwen1.5-14B: 29.3 (#230), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#69)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1094 | — |
| MMLU | 68.6% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen1.5-14B: 30.8 (#257), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1095 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1147 | — |
| LMArena French | 1115 | — |
| LMArena German | 1043 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1019 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1046 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1085 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen1.5-14B: 57.1 (#266), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1102 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#252), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1113 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#270), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1128 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1091 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1110 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen1.5-14B better than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-14B and Qwen3.7 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-14B has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.