Model comparison
Qwen1.5-110B vs Yi-Large
Qwen1.5-110B has enough public results to be ranked (#231); Yi-Large does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen1.5-110B scores higher in 0 categories and Yi-Large in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Yi-Large leads 36.1 to 32.4.
- Qwen1.5-110B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen1.5-110B | Yi-Large | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 33.6 | 37.6 |
| Released | 2024-04-25 | 2024-05-13 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Yi-Large leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 32.4 (#260), Yi-Large: 36.1 (#201)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 35% | 37.7% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 44.4% | 47.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1184 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Qwen1.5-110B: 21.7 (#192), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1168 | — |
| ForecastBench | 57.7 | — |
Math Not comparable
Qwen1.5-110B: 31.1 (#199), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1185 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen1.5-110B: 30.7 (#217), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1144 | — |
| MMLU | — | 79.3% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen1.5-110B: 33.8 (#245), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1142 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1206 | — |
| LMArena French | 1150 | — |
| LMArena German | 1123 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1074 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1044 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1141 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen1.5-110B: 60.6 (#247), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1158 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen1.5-110B: 35.0 (#237), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1157 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen1.5-110B: 38.1 (#250), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1175 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1148 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1160 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen1.5-110B better than Yi-Large?
Qwen1.5-110B has enough public results to be ranked (#231); Yi-Large does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Qwen1.5-110B or Yi-Large better for coding?
Yi-Large scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-110B and Yi-Large share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-110B has 20 scored results on Noometry and Yi-Large has 3.