Model comparison
Qwen1.5-110B vs Yi-34B
Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.6 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen1.5-110B scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-34B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen1.5-110B leads 30.7 to 7.5.
Side by side
| Qwen1.5-110B | Yi-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 33.6 | 27.4 |
| Released | 2024-04-25 | 2023-11-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Qwen1.5-110B: 32.4 (#260), Yi-34B: 31.8 (#269)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1184 | 1112 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 35% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 44.4% | — |
Reasoning Qwen1.5-110B leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 21.7 (#192), Yi-34B: 20.3 (#222)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1168 | 1104 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 71.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 117.28 |
| ForecastBench | 57.7 | — |
Math Qwen1.5-110B leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 31.1 (#199), Yi-34B: 19.8 (#277)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1185 | 1114 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 5.1% |
| GSM8K | — | 76% |
Knowledge Qwen1.5-110B leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 30.7 (#217), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#304)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1144 | 1061 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 14.7% |
| MMLU | — | 76.3% |
Multilingual Qwen1.5-110B leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 33.8 (#245), Yi-34B: 29.9 (#259)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1142 | 1079 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1206 | 1175 |
| LMArena French | 1150 | 1080 |
| LMArena German | 1123 | 1042 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1074 | 993 |
| LMArena Korean | 1044 | 959 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1050 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1141 | 1070 |
Instruction Following Qwen1.5-110B leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 60.6 (#247), Yi-34B: 56.4 (#269)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1158 | 1091 |
Long Context Qwen1.5-110B leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 35.0 (#237), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#259)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1157 | 1094 |
Writing & Preference Qwen1.5-110B leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 38.1 (#250), Yi-34B: 34.3 (#268)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1175 | 1129 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1148 | 1108 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1160 | 1113 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen1.5-110B better than Yi-34B?
Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.6 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen1.5-110B or Yi-34B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (32.4 vs 31.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-110B and Yi-34B share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-110B has 20 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.