Model comparison
Qwen1.5-110B vs Qwen3.5-Flash
Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen1.5-110B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5-Flash leads 58.2 to 38.1.
- Qwen1.5-110B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3.5-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.6 | 42.3 |
| Released | 2024-04-25 | 2026-02-23 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Results tracked | 20 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.5-Flash leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 32.4 (#260), Qwen3.5-Flash: 33.9 (#234)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1184 | 1412 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1243 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 35% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 44.4% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 221.8 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Qwen1.5-110B: —, Qwen3.5-Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 462.69 |
Reasoning Qwen3.5-Flash leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 21.7 (#192), Qwen3.5-Flash: 32.9 (#63)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1168 | 1404 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 20% |
| DTBench | — | 82.9% |
| LMCA | — | 29.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.98 |
| ForecastBench | 57.7 | — |
Math Qwen3.5-Flash leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 31.1 (#199), Qwen3.5-Flash: 36.3 (#117)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1185 | 1407 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.4% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 6.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
Knowledge Qwen3.5-Flash leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 30.7 (#217), Qwen3.5-Flash: 43.2 (#84)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1144 | 1408 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 20.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.5% |
Multilingual Qwen3.5-Flash leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 33.8 (#245), Qwen3.5-Flash: 50.7 (#116)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1142 | 1385 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1206 | 1446 |
| LMArena French | 1150 | 1412 |
| LMArena German | 1123 | 1389 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1074 | 1369 |
| LMArena Korean | 1044 | 1344 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1379 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1141 | 1399 |
Instruction Following Qwen3.5-Flash leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 60.6 (#247), Qwen3.5-Flash: 72.8 (#133)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1158 | 1374 |
Long Context Qwen3.5-Flash leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 35.0 (#237), Qwen3.5-Flash: 42.4 (#119)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1157 | 1392 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.5-Flash leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 38.1 (#250), Qwen3.5-Flash: 58.2 (#117)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1175 | 1397 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1148 | 1343 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1160 | 1393 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen1.5-110B better than Qwen3.5-Flash?
Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen1.5-110B or Qwen3.5-Flash better for coding?
Qwen3.5-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.9 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-110B and Qwen3.5-Flash share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-110B has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-Flash has 32.