Model comparison
Qwen1.5-110B vs Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
Qwen1.5-110B has enough public results to be ranked (#234); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Side by side
| Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 34.2 | — |
| Released | 2024-04-25 | 2024-09-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 35% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1184 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 44.4% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1168 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 113.14 |
| ForecastBench | 57.7 | — |
| HellaSwag | — | 76.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.9% |
Math Not comparable
Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1185 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 86.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1144 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.9% |
| MMLU | — | 68% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1142 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1206 | — |
| LMArena French | 1151 | — |
| LMArena German | 1123 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1074 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1044 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1142 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1158 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1157 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1175 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1148 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1160 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen1.5-110B better than Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)?
Qwen1.5-110B has enough public results to be ranked (#234); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-110B and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-110B has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has 6.