Model comparison
Qwen1.5-110B vs Qwen1.5 4b Chat
Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.2 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen1.5-110B scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5 4b Chat in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen1.5-110B leads 38.0 to 23.8.
Side by side
| Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 34.2 | 28.8 |
| Released | 2024-04-25 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen1.5-110B leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 29.1 (#308)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1184 | 999 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 35% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 44.4% | — |
Reasoning Qwen1.5-110B leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 18.5 (#279)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1168 | 976 |
| ForecastBench | 57.7 | — |
Math Qwen1.5-110B leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.4 (#234)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1185 | 1026 |
Knowledge Qwen1.5-110B leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 26.7 (#255)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1144 | 980 |
Multilingual Qwen1.5-110B leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 24.1 (#290)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1142 | 979 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1206 | 1024 |
| LMArena German | 1123 | 902 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 952 |
| LMArena French | 1151 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1074 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1044 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1142 | — |
Instruction Following Qwen1.5-110B leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 49.0 (#300)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1158 | 978 |
Long Context Qwen1.5-110B leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.1 (#290)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1157 | 988 |
Writing & Preference Qwen1.5-110B leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 23.8 (#309)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1175 | 997 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1148 | 969 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1160 | 977 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen1.5-110B better than Qwen1.5 4b Chat?
Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.2 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen1.5-110B or Qwen1.5 4b Chat better for coding?
Qwen1.5-110B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.0 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-110B and Qwen1.5 4b Chat share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-110B has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5 4b Chat has 13.