Model comparison

Qwen Turbo vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Qwen Turbo Alibaba (Qwen)

27.1

Rank #335 Reported

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 StepFun

39.2

Rank #171 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads 36.3 to 15.3.

Side by side

Qwen Turbo and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 specifications
Qwen TurboStep 2 16k Exp 202412
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)StepFun
Noometry Index27.139.2
Released2024-11-01—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output16K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.05—
Output $ / M tokens$0.20—
Results tracked312

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Qwen Turbo: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 38.5 (#174)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen TurboStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Coding—1316

Reasoning Not comparable

Qwen Turbo: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 25.9 (#142)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen TurboStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Hard Prompts—1299

Math Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 36.3 (#169)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen TurboStep 2 16k Exp 202412
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20256.1%—
LMArena Math—1304
MATH Level 556.2%—

Knowledge Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 35.2 (#187)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen TurboStep 2 16k Exp 202412
GPQA Diamond41.8%—
LMArena Expert—1279

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen Turbo: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.7 (#181)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen TurboStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Non-English—1290
LMArena Chinese—1331
LMArena Russian—1324

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen Turbo: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 67.9 (#192)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen TurboStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Instruction Following—1287

Long Context Not comparable

Qwen Turbo: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#170)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen TurboStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Longer Query—1307

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen Turbo: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.3 (#173)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen TurboStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Text—1321
LMArena Creative Writing—1328
LMArena Multi-Turn—1292

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen Turbo better than Step 2 16k Exp 202412?

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Qwen Turbo and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen Turbo has 3 scored results on Noometry and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper