Model comparison
Qwen Turbo vs StarCoder 2 15B
Qwen Turbo has enough public results to be ranked (#335); StarCoder 2 15B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
NVIDIASummary
- StarCoder 2 15B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen Turbo | StarCoder 2 15B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 38.1 |
| Released | 2024-11-01 | 2024-02-20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 16K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.05 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen Turbo: —, StarCoder 2 15B: 36.6
| Benchmark | Qwen Turbo | StarCoder 2 15B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 38.4% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 37.8% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Qwen Turbo: —, StarCoder 2 15B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen Turbo | StarCoder 2 15B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 105 |
| WinoGrande | — | 64.3% |
Math Not comparable
Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297), StarCoder 2 15B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen Turbo | StarCoder 2 15B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 6.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 56.2% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 57.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272), StarCoder 2 15B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen Turbo | StarCoder 2 15B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41.8% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 47.2% |
| MMLU | — | 64.1% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen Turbo better than StarCoder 2 15B?
Qwen Turbo has enough public results to be ranked (#335); StarCoder 2 15B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Qwen Turbo and StarCoder 2 15B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen Turbo has 3 scored results on Noometry and StarCoder 2 15B has 7.