Model comparison

Qwen Plus vs Step 5 Preview

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.9 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Plus costs 2.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Step 5 Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Qwen Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

37.1

Rank #210 Confirmed

Step 5 Preview StepFun

47.9

Rank #58 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen Plus scores higher in 0 categories and Step 5 Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Step 5 Preview leads 46.1 to 23.3.
  • Qwen Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $2.70 for Step 5 Preview.
  • Step 5 Preview accepts more context: 1.02M tokens versus 1M.

Side by side

Qwen Plus and Step 5 Preview specifications
Qwen PlusStep 5 Preview
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)StepFun
Noometry Index37.147.9
Released2024-01-252026-09-16
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M1.02M
Max output33K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.40$1
Output $ / M tokens$1.20$2.70
Results tracked2018

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 5 Preview leads

Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167), Step 5 Preview: 51.8 (#36)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen PlusStep 5 Preview
LMArena Coding13281480
LMArena WebDev—1564
SciCode—58.9%

Reasoning Step 5 Preview leads

Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107), Step 5 Preview: 40.0 (#57)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen PlusStep 5 Preview
LMArena Hard Prompts13171465
Kagi LLM Benchmark63.3%—
CritPt—20.9%
DTBench81.1%—
LMCA24%—

Math Step 5 Preview leads

Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271), Step 5 Preview: 46.1 (#72)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen PlusStep 5 Preview
LMArena Math13261470
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202517.8%—
ProofBench—42%
MATH Level 565.3%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)1.7%—

Knowledge Step 5 Preview leads

Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251), Step 5 Preview: 41.2 (#112)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen PlusStep 5 Preview
LMArena Expert13281470
GPQA Diamond48.1%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Qwen Plus: —, Step 5 Preview: 41.0 (#41)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen PlusStep 5 Preview
LMArena Vision—1267

Multilingual Step 5 Preview leads

Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175), Step 5 Preview: 53.8 (#54)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen PlusStep 5 Preview
LMArena Non-English13101432
LMArena Chinese13471519
LMArena Russian13231436
LMArena Japanese1251—
LMArena Spanish—1439

Instruction Following Step 5 Preview leads

Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181), Step 5 Preview: 76.0 (#50)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen PlusStep 5 Preview
LMArena Instruction Following13031444

Long Context Step 5 Preview leads

Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158), Step 5 Preview: 44.5 (#64)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen PlusStep 5 Preview
LMArena Longer Query13241455

Writing & Preference Step 5 Preview leads

Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176), Step 5 Preview: 62.8 (#71)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen PlusStep 5 Preview
LMArena Text13261442
LMArena Creative Writing12931410
LMArena Multi-Turn13361447

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen Plus better than Step 5 Preview?

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.9 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Plus costs 2.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Step 5 Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Qwen Plus or Step 5 Preview?

Qwen Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Step 5 Preview lists at $1 and $2.70.

Is Qwen Plus or Step 5 Preview better for coding?

Step 5 Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.8 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Step 5 Preview does, with 1.02M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks do Qwen Plus and Step 5 Preview share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen Plus has 20 scored results on Noometry and Step 5 Preview has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper