Model comparison
Qwen Plus vs Step 1o Turbo 202506
Step 1o Turbo 202506 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
StepFunSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen Plus scores higher in 1 category and Step 1o Turbo 202506 in 7 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads 36.6 to 23.3.
Side by side
| Qwen Plus | Step 1o Turbo 202506 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 37.1 | 39.7 |
| Released | 2024-01-25 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 39.2 (#160)
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1328 | 1339 |
Reasoning Qwen Plus leads
Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 26.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1317 | 1335 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 63.3% | — |
| DTBench | 81.1% | — |
| LMCA | 24% | — |
Math Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads
Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 36.6 (#164)
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1326 | 1318 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 17.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 65.3% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads
Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 36.1 (#176)
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1328 | 1308 |
| GPQA Diamond | 48.1% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Qwen Plus: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 36.1 (#80)
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1186 |
Multilingual Too close to call
Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 45.3 (#173)
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1310 | 1313 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1347 | 1380 |
| LMArena Russian | 1323 | 1327 |
| LMArena German | — | 1314 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1251 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 69.2 (#176)
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1303 | 1310 |
Long Context Too close to call
Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 41.0 (#146)
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1324 | 1348 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 53.1 (#160)
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1326 | 1336 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1293 | 1307 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1336 | 1340 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen Plus better than Step 1o Turbo 202506?
Step 1o Turbo 202506 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen Plus or Step 1o Turbo 202506 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (38.9 vs 39.2); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Qwen Plus and Step 1o Turbo 202506 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen Plus has 20 scored results on Noometry and Step 1o Turbo 202506 has 14.