Model comparison

Qwen Plus vs Qwen3 8B

Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 8B costs 1.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Qwen Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

37.1

Rank #210 Confirmed

Qwen3 8B Alibaba (Qwen)

33.7

Rank #238 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen Plus scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3 8B in 2 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen Plus leads 28.4 to 16.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 17.8% for Qwen Plus and 56.1% for Qwen3 8B.
  • Qwen3 8B is cheaper at $0.18 / $0.70 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $1.20 for Qwen Plus.
  • Qwen Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 131K.
  • Qwen3 8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen Plus and Qwen3 8B specifications
Qwen PlusQwen3 8B
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index37.133.7
Released2024-01-252025-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M131K
Max output33K8K
Input $ / M tokens$0.40$0.18
Output $ / M tokens$1.20$0.70
Results tracked2011

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen Plus leads

Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167), Qwen3 8B: 34.0 (#248)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen PlusQwen3 8B
SciCode—22.6%
LMArena Coding1328—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen Plus: —, Qwen3 8B: 30.2 (#78)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen PlusQwen3 8B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—42.6%

Reasoning Qwen Plus leads

Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107), Qwen3 8B: 16.6 (#303)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen PlusQwen3 8B
DTBench81.1%59.7%
LMCA24%8.8%
Kagi LLM Benchmark63.3%—
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles—5%
LMArena Hard Prompts1317—
Epoch Capabilities Index—136.17

Math Qwen3 8B leads

Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271), Qwen3 8B: 34.9 (#191)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen PlusQwen3 8B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202517.8%56.1%
LMArena Math1326—
MATH Level 565.3%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)1.7%—

Knowledge Qwen3 8B leads

Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251), Qwen3 8B: 36.1 (#173)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen PlusQwen3 8B
GPQA Diamond48.1%56.8%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—4.8%
LMArena Expert1328—

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175), Qwen3 8B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen PlusQwen3 8B
LMArena Non-English1310—
LMArena Chinese1347—
LMArena Japanese1251—
LMArena Russian1323—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181), Qwen3 8B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen PlusQwen3 8B
LMArena Instruction Following1303—

Long Context Qwen Plus leads

Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158), Qwen3 8B: 37.9 (#210)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen PlusQwen3 8B
Fiction.LiveBench—62.1%
LMArena Longer Query1324—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176), Qwen3 8B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen PlusQwen3 8B
LMArena Text1326—
LMArena Creative Writing1293—
LMArena Multi-Turn1336—

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen Plus better than Qwen3 8B?

Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 8B costs 1.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Qwen Plus or Qwen3 8B?

Qwen3 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.18 per million input tokens and $0.70 per million output tokens; Qwen Plus lists at $0.40 and $1.20.

Is Qwen Plus or Qwen3 8B better for coding?

Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 34.0 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen Plus does, with 1M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Qwen Plus and Qwen3 8B share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen Plus has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 8B has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper