Model comparison
Qwen Plus vs Qwen3-4B
Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen Plus scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3-4B in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen Plus leads 28.4 to 19.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 17.8% for Qwen Plus and 52.2% for Qwen3-4B.
- Qwen3-4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen Plus | Qwen3-4B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.1 | 31.9 |
| Released | 2024-01-25 | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1328 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Qwen Plus: —, Qwen3-4B: 27.6 (#100)
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 35.7% |
Reasoning Qwen Plus leads
Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107), Qwen3-4B: 19.2 (#268)
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 63.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1317 | — |
| DTBench | 81.1% | — |
| LMCA | 24% | — |
Math Qwen3-4B leads
Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271), Qwen3-4B: 29.7 (#240)
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 17.8% | 52.2% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 38.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1326 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 65.3% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3-4B leads
Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251), Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#208)
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 48.1% | 52.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1328 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1310 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1347 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1251 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1323 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1303 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1324 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1326 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1293 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1336 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen Plus better than Qwen3-4B?
Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Qwen Plus and Qwen3-4B share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen Plus has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.