Model comparison

Qwen Max vs Qwen3 14B

Qwen Max and Qwen3 14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (34.7 vs 35.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Qwen Max Alibaba (Qwen)

34.7

Rank #230 Confirmed

Qwen3 14B Alibaba (Qwen)

35.5

Rank #225 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen Max scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3 14B in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3 14B leads 38.6 to 22.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 16.1% for Qwen Max and 66.4% for Qwen3 14B.
  • Qwen3 14B is cheaper at $0.35 / $1.40 per million input/output tokens, against $1.60 / $6.40 for Qwen Max.
  • Qwen3 14B accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 33K.
  • Qwen3 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen Max and Qwen3 14B specifications
Qwen MaxQwen3 14B
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index34.735.5
Released2024-04-032025-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window33K131K
Max output8K8K
Input $ / M tokens$1.60$0.35
Output $ / M tokens$6.40$1.40
Results tracked2312

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3 14B leads

Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292), Qwen3 14B: 37.3 (#195)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen MaxQwen3 14B
Aider Polyglot21.8%—
SciCode—31.6%
LMArena Coding1288—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen Max: —, Qwen3 14B: 29.6 (#83)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen MaxQwen3 14B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—41%

Reasoning Qwen Max leads

Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151), Qwen3 14B: 18.5 (#280)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen MaxQwen3 14B
Kagi LLM Benchmark—49.1%
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles—4%
LMArena Hard Prompts1269—
DTBench—64%
LMCA—18.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—138.23

Math Qwen3 14B leads

Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276), Qwen3 14B: 38.6 (#133)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen MaxQwen3 14B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202516.1%66.4%
LMArena Math1275—
MATH Level 567.2%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)1%—

Knowledge Qwen3 14B leads

Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228), Qwen3 14B: 39.3 (#134)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen MaxQwen3 14B
GPQA Diamond56.1%63.8%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.4%
LMArena Expert1248—

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202), Qwen3 14B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen MaxQwen3 14B
LMArena Non-English1263—
LMArena Chinese1254—
LMArena French1330—
LMArena German1254—
LMArena Japanese1205—
LMArena Korean1142—
LMArena Russian1274—
LMArena Spanish1290—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208), Qwen3 14B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen MaxQwen3 14B
LMArena Instruction Following1262—

Long Context Qwen Max leads

Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180), Qwen3 14B: 38.1 (#204)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen MaxQwen3 14B
Fiction.LiveBench66.7%62.5%
LMArena Longer Query1288—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205), Qwen3 14B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen MaxQwen3 14B
LMArena Text1282—
LMArena Creative Writing1248—
LMArena Multi-Turn1277—

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen Max better than Qwen3 14B?

Qwen Max and Qwen3 14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (34.7 vs 35.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, Qwen Max or Qwen3 14B?

Qwen3 14B is cheaper. It lists at $0.35 per million input tokens and $1.40 per million output tokens; Qwen Max lists at $1.60 and $6.40.

Is Qwen Max or Qwen3 14B better for coding?

Qwen3 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.3 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 14B does, with 131K tokens against 33K.

How many benchmarks do Qwen Max and Qwen3 14B share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen Max has 23 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper