Model comparison
Qwen Max vs Qwen Plus
Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen Max scores higher in 1 category and Qwen Plus in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen Plus leads 38.9 to 30.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 56.1% for Qwen Max and 48.1% for Qwen Plus.
- Qwen Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $1.60 / $6.40 for Qwen Max.
- Qwen Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 33K.
Side by side
| Qwen Max | Qwen Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 34.7 | 37.1 |
| Released | 2024-04-03 | 2024-01-25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 33K | 1M |
| Max output | 8K | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.60 | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $6.40 | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 23 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen Plus leads
Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292), Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)
| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1288 | 1328 |
| Aider Polyglot | 21.8% | — |
Reasoning Qwen Plus leads
Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151), Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1269 | 1317 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |
Math Too close to call
Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276), Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)
| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 16.1% | 17.8% |
| LMArena Math | 1275 | 1326 |
| MATH Level 5 | 67.2% | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1% | 1.7% |
Knowledge Qwen Max leads
Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228), Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)
| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 56.1% | 48.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | 1328 |
Multilingual Qwen Plus leads
Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202), Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1263 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1254 | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1205 | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | 1274 | 1323 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1254 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1142 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1290 | — |
Instruction Following Qwen Plus leads
Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208), Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)
| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1262 | 1303 |
Long Context Too close to call
Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180), Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)
| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1288 | 1324 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 66.7% | — |
Writing & Preference Qwen Plus leads
Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205), Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)
| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1282 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1248 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1277 | 1336 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen Max better than Qwen Plus?
Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Qwen Max or Qwen Plus?
Qwen Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Qwen Max lists at $1.60 and $6.40.
Is Qwen Max or Qwen Plus better for coding?
Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen Plus does, with 1M tokens against 33K.
How many benchmarks do Qwen Max and Qwen Plus share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen Max has 23 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.