Model comparison

Qwen-14B vs Qwen3 Max

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Qwen-14B Alibaba (Qwen)

31.4

Rank #275 Confirmed

Qwen3 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

43.7

Rank #87 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen-14B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 Max in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3 Max leads 62.4 to 27.6.
  • Qwen-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen-14B and Qwen3 Max specifications
Qwen-14BQwen3 Max
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index31.443.7
Released2023-09-242025-09-23
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.20
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked1833

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3 Max leads

Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288), Qwen3 Max: 43.0 (#93)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen-14BQwen3 Max
LMArena Coding10711456
ALE-Bench—370.45

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen-14B: —, Qwen3 Max: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen-14BQwen3 Max
Vending-Bench 2—71.56

Reasoning Qwen3 Max leads

Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257), Qwen3 Max: 22.6 (#190)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen-14BQwen3 Max
LMArena Hard Prompts10271448
Epoch Capabilities Index113.03142.38
Kagi LLM Benchmark—72.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—30.1%
Chess Puzzles—4%
Mystery Game Puzzles—5%
DTBench—82.1%
LMCA—28.3%
BIG-Bench Hard55%—
LAMBADA71.1%—
PIQA79.9%—

Math Qwen3 Max leads

Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227), Qwen3 Max: 38.7 (#131)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen-14BQwen3 Max
LMArena Math10681446
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—18.9%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—73.3%
MATH Level 5—97.1%
GSM8K61.3%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Qwen-14B: —, Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#78)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen-14BQwen3 Max
GPQA Diamond—72.6%
SimpleQA Verified—48.7%
LMArena Expert—1455
ARC (AI2) Challenge84.4%—
BoolQ86.2%—
MMLU66.3%—

Multilingual Qwen3 Max leads

Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275), Qwen3 Max: 53.7 (#62)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen-14BQwen3 Max
LMArena Non-English10411429
LMArena Chinese10771478
LMArena French—1449
LMArena German—1463
LMArena Japanese—1397
LMArena Korean—1399
LMArena Russian—1428
LMArena Spanish—1462

Instruction Following Qwen3 Max leads

Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289), Qwen3 Max: 74.8 (#87)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen-14BQwen3 Max
LMArena Instruction Following10311419

Long Context Qwen3 Max leads

Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280), Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#134)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen-14BQwen3 Max
LMArena Longer Query10281438
Fiction.LiveBench—66.7%
CL-bench—14.5%

Writing & Preference Qwen3 Max leads

Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299), Qwen3 Max: 62.4 (#76)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen-14BQwen3 Max
LMArena Text10511439
LMArena Creative Writing10281402
LMArena Multi-Turn10221446

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen-14B better than Qwen3 Max?

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Qwen-14B or Qwen3 Max better for coding?

Qwen3 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Qwen-14B and Qwen3 Max share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen-14B has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper