Model comparison
Qwen-14B vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.8 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen3 Coder Next leads 35.8 to 30.6.
Side by side
| Qwen-14B | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 33.8 |
| Released | 2023-09-24 | 2026-02-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.12 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3 Coder Next leads
Qwen-14B: 30.6 (#283), Qwen3 Coder Next: 35.8 (#206)
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1072 | — |
Reasoning Qwen3 Coder Next leads
Qwen-14B: 18.7 (#255), Qwen3 Coder Next: 21.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1027 | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.8 | — |
| LAMBADA | 71.1% | — |
| PIQA | 79.9% | — |
Math Not comparable
Qwen-14B: 28.7 (#224), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1068 | — |
| GSM8K | 61.3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen-14B: —, Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 84.4% | — |
| BoolQ | 86.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.3% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen-14B: 27.7 (#270), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1042 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1077 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen-14B: 52.6 (#284), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1031 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#276), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1029 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen-14B: 27.8 (#294), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1051 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1028 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1022 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen-14B better than Qwen3 Coder Next?
Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.8 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen-14B or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?
Qwen3 Coder Next scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 30.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen-14B and Qwen3 Coder Next share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen-14B has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.