Model comparison

Phi-4 vs Yi-Large

Phi-4 has enough public results to be ranked (#279); Yi-Large does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Phi-4 Microsoft

31.2

Rank #279 Confirmed

Yi-Large 01.AI

38.1

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi-4 scores higher in 0 categories and Yi-Large in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 55.4% for Phi-4 and 47.2% for Yi-Large.
  • Phi-4 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Phi-4 and Yi-Large specifications
Phi-4Yi-Large
ProviderMicrosoft01.AI
Noometry Index31.238.1
Released2024-12-112024-05-13
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.07—
Output $ / M tokens$0.14—
Results tracked373

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Yi-Large leads

Phi-4: 34.4 (#239), Yi-Large: 36.7 (#203)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4Yi-Large
BigCodeBench Instruct45.5%37.7%
BigCodeBench Complete55.4%47.2%
LiveBench Coding30.7%—
LMArena Coding1231—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Phi-4: 22.8 (#128), Yi-Large: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4Yi-Large
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard28.8%—
BALROG11.6%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Phi-4: 17.7 (#291), Yi-Large: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4Yi-Large
Chess Puzzles1%—
LiveBench Reasoning47.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1220—
LiveBench Data Analysis45.2%—
Epoch Capabilities Index130.42—
LiveBench41.6%—

Math Not comparable

Phi-4: 20.8 (#285), Yi-Large: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4Yi-Large
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202513.8%—
LiveBench Math42%—
LMArena Math1246—
MATH Level 564.9%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Phi-4: 32.6 (#209), Yi-Large: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4Yi-Large
MMLU84.8%79.3%
GPQA Diamond56.1%—
Confabulations29.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate3.7%—
LMArena Expert1203—

Multilingual Not comparable

Phi-4: 37.2 (#237), Yi-Large: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4Yi-Large
LMArena Non-English1197—
LMArena Chinese1212—
LMArena French1224—
LMArena German1222—
LMArena Japanese1158—
LMArena Korean1151—
LMArena Russian1209—
LMArena Spanish1234—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Phi-4: 60.4 (#251), Yi-Large: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4Yi-Large
LiveBench Instruction Following58.4%—
LMArena Instruction Following1201—

Long Context Not comparable

Phi-4: 36.9 (#226), Yi-Large: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4Yi-Large
LMArena Longer Query1217—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Phi-4: 40.5 (#244), Yi-Large: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4Yi-Large
LMArena Text1217—
LMArena Creative Writing1182—
Short-Story Creative Writing62.6%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1206—
LiveBench Language25.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi-4 better than Yi-Large?

Phi-4 has enough public results to be ranked (#279); Yi-Large does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is Phi-4 or Yi-Large better for coding?

Yi-Large scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.7 versus 34.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Phi-4 and Yi-Large share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-4 has 37 scored results on Noometry and Yi-Large has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper