Model comparison

Phi-4 Mini vs Step 5 Preview

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.9 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index. Phi-4 Mini costs 11× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Step 5 Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Phi-4 Mini Microsoft

30.9

Rank #283 Reported

Step 5 Preview StepFun

47.9

Rank #58 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi-4 Mini scores higher in 0 categories and Step 5 Preview in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Step 5 Preview leads 51.8 to 28.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 10.8% for Phi-4 Mini and 58.9% for Step 5 Preview.
  • Phi-4 Mini is cheaper at $0.075 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $2.70 for Step 5 Preview.
  • Step 5 Preview accepts more context: 1.02M tokens versus 128K.
  • Phi-4 Mini has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Phi-4 Mini and Step 5 Preview specifications
Phi-4 MiniStep 5 Preview
ProviderMicrosoftStepFun
Noometry Index30.947.9
Released2024-12-112026-09-16
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K1.02M
Max output4K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.075$1
Output $ / M tokens$0.30$2.70
Results tracked318

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 5 Preview leads

Phi-4 Mini: 28.1 (#317), Step 5 Preview: 51.8 (#36)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4 MiniStep 5 Preview
SciCode10.8%58.9%
LMArena WebDev—1564
LMArena Coding—1480

Reasoning Step 5 Preview leads

Phi-4 Mini: 22.4 (#195), Step 5 Preview: 40.0 (#57)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4 MiniStep 5 Preview
CritPt0%20.9%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1465

Math Not comparable

Phi-4 Mini: —, Step 5 Preview: 46.1 (#72)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4 MiniStep 5 Preview
ProofBench—42%
LMArena Math—1470

Knowledge Step 5 Preview leads

Phi-4 Mini: 25.3 (#262), Step 5 Preview: 41.2 (#112)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4 MiniStep 5 Preview
Vectara Hallucination Rate23.5%—
LMArena Expert—1470

Multimodal Not comparable

Phi-4 Mini: —, Step 5 Preview: 41.0 (#41)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4 MiniStep 5 Preview
LMArena Vision—1267

Multilingual Not comparable

Phi-4 Mini: —, Step 5 Preview: 53.8 (#54)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4 MiniStep 5 Preview
LMArena Non-English—1432
LMArena Chinese—1519
LMArena Russian—1436
LMArena Spanish—1439

Instruction Following Not comparable

Phi-4 Mini: —, Step 5 Preview: 76.0 (#50)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4 MiniStep 5 Preview
LMArena Instruction Following—1444

Long Context Not comparable

Phi-4 Mini: —, Step 5 Preview: 44.5 (#64)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4 MiniStep 5 Preview
LMArena Longer Query—1455

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Phi-4 Mini: —, Step 5 Preview: 62.8 (#71)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4 MiniStep 5 Preview
LMArena Text—1442
LMArena Creative Writing—1410
LMArena Multi-Turn—1447

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi-4 Mini better than Step 5 Preview?

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.9 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index. Phi-4 Mini costs 11× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Step 5 Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Phi-4 Mini or Step 5 Preview?

Phi-4 Mini is cheaper. It lists at $0.075 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; Step 5 Preview lists at $1 and $2.70.

Is Phi-4 Mini or Step 5 Preview better for coding?

Step 5 Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.8 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Step 5 Preview does, with 1.02M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Phi-4 Mini and Step 5 Preview share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-4 Mini has 3 scored results on Noometry and Step 5 Preview has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper