Model comparison

Phi-4 Mini vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Phi-4 Mini Microsoft

30.4

Rank #280 Reported

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 StepFun

38.6

Rank #173 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads 37.9 to 27.6.
  • Phi-4 Mini has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Phi-4 Mini and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 specifications
Phi-4 MiniStep 2 16k Exp 202412
ProviderMicrosoftStepFun
Noometry Index30.438.6
Released2024-12-11—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.075—
Output $ / M tokens$0.30—
Results tracked312

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Phi-4 Mini: 27.6 (#312), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 37.9 (#170)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4 MiniStep 2 16k Exp 202412
SciCode10.8%—
LMArena Coding—1316

Reasoning Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Phi-4 Mini: 21.7 (#190), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 24.8 (#140)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4 MiniStep 2 16k Exp 202412
CritPt0%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1299

Math Not comparable

Phi-4 Mini: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 33.6 (#171)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4 MiniStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Math—1305

Knowledge Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Phi-4 Mini: 24.8 (#261), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 34.6 (#187)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4 MiniStep 2 16k Exp 202412
Vectara Hallucination Rate23.5%—
LMArena Expert—1279

Multilingual Not comparable

Phi-4 Mini: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.9 (#176)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4 MiniStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Non-English—1290
LMArena Chinese—1331
LMArena Russian—1324

Instruction Following Not comparable

Phi-4 Mini: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 68.1 (#187)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4 MiniStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Instruction Following—1287

Long Context Not comparable

Phi-4 Mini: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#165)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4 MiniStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Longer Query—1307

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Phi-4 Mini: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.5 (#168)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4 MiniStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Text—1321
LMArena Creative Writing—1328
LMArena Multi-Turn—1292

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi-4 Mini better than Step 2 16k Exp 202412?

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Phi-4 Mini or Step 2 16k Exp 202412 better for coding?

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.9 versus 27.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Phi-4 Mini and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-4 Mini has 3 scored results on Noometry and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper