Model comparison
Phi-4 Mini vs Qwen3.7 Max
Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index. Phi-4 Mini costs 29× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.7 Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Microsoft
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi-4 Mini scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Max in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 61.6 to 25.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 10.8% for Phi-4 Mini and 48.8% for Qwen3.7 Max.
- Phi-4 Mini is cheaper at $0.075 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3.7 Max.
- Qwen3.7 Max accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
- Phi-4 Mini has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Phi-4 Mini | Qwen3.7 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.9 | 51.5 |
| Released | 2024-12-11 | 2026-05-19 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | 1M |
| Max output | 4K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.075 | $2.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.30 | $7.50 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 33 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.7 Max leads
Phi-4 Mini: 28.1 (#317), Qwen3.7 Max: 50.4 (#45)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 10.8% | 48.8% |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 77.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1515 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1498 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,189 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Phi-4 Mini: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 22.1 (#135)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | — | 0.4% |
Reasoning Qwen3.7 Max leads
Phi-4 Mini: 22.4 (#195), Qwen3.7 Max: 49.2 (#38)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 13.4% |
| SimpleBench | — | 70.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 85.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 19% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 9.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1483 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 32% |
| DTBench | — | 92.3% |
| LMCA | — | 44% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 153.68 |
Math Not comparable
Phi-4 Mini: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 62.4 (#32)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 64.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 34.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 95.6% |
| ProofBench | — | 26% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1490 |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Max leads
Phi-4 Mini: 25.3 (#262), Qwen3.7 Max: 61.6 (#28)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 90.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 55.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 23.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1488 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Phi-4 Mini: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 56.9 (#15)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1530 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1484 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Phi-4 Mini: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 76.7 (#38)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1460 |
Long Context Not comparable
Phi-4 Mini: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#40)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1482 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Phi-4 Mini: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 65.0 (#54)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1476 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1449 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1110 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1481 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi-4 Mini better than Qwen3.7 Max?
Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index. Phi-4 Mini costs 29× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.7 Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Phi-4 Mini or Qwen3.7 Max?
Phi-4 Mini is cheaper. It lists at $0.075 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Max lists at $2.50 and $7.50.
Is Phi-4 Mini or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?
Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.4 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.7 Max does, with 1M tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Phi-4 Mini and Qwen3.7 Max share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-4 Mini has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.