Model comparison
Phi-4 Mini vs Qwen-14B
Phi-4 Mini and Qwen-14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.9 vs 31.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Microsoft
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen-14B leads 31.2 to 28.1.
Side by side
| Phi-4 Mini | Qwen-14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.9 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2024-12-11 | 2023-09-24 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.075 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen-14B leads
Phi-4 Mini: 28.1 (#317), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 10.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1071 |
Reasoning Phi-4 Mini leads
Phi-4 Mini: 22.4 (#195), Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1027 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 113.03 |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |
Math Not comparable
Phi-4 Mini: —, Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1068 |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Phi-4 Mini: 25.3 (#262), Qwen-14B: —
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 23.5% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.3% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Phi-4 Mini: —, Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1041 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1077 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Phi-4 Mini: —, Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1031 |
Long Context Not comparable
Phi-4 Mini: —, Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1028 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Phi-4 Mini: —, Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1022 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi-4 Mini better than Qwen-14B?
Phi-4 Mini and Qwen-14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.9 vs 31.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Phi-4 Mini or Qwen-14B better for coding?
Qwen-14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.2 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Phi-4 Mini and Qwen-14B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-4 Mini has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.