Model comparison

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#314); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct Microsoft

29.3

Rank #314 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads 37.7 to 27.9.

Side by side

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct specifications
Phi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen2.5 14B Instruct
ProviderMicrosoftAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.338.7
Released2024-04-232024-09
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.35
Output $ / M tokens—$1.40
Results tracked323

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.9 (#318), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: 37.7 (#191)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen2.5 14B Instruct
BigCodeBench Instruct—39.8%
LiveBench Coding20.3%—
LMArena Coding1101—
BigCodeBench Complete—52.2%

Reasoning Not comparable

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.8 (#323), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen2.5 14B Instruct
LiveBench Reasoning15.9%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1100—
LiveBench Data Analysis30.3%—
Adversarial NLI58.1%—
BIG-Bench Hard79.1%—
HellaSwag77%—
LiveBench24%—
WinoGrande81.5%—

Math Not comparable

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.6 (#248), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen2.5 14B Instruct
LiveBench Math17.6%—
LMArena Math1151—

Knowledge Not comparable

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 29.1 (#240), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen2.5 14B Instruct
MMLU75.7%79.9%
LMArena Expert1067—
ARC (AI2) Challenge90.7%—
OpenBookQA88%—
TriviaQA58.1%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#272), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen2.5 14B Instruct
LMArena Non-English1058—
LMArena Chinese1061—
LMArena French1135—
LMArena German1080—
LMArena Japanese966—
LMArena Korean894—
LMArena Russian1111—
LMArena Spanish1111—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 51.9 (#292), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen2.5 14B Instruct
LiveBench Instruction Following47.2%—
LMArena Instruction Following1087—

Long Context Not comparable

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#267), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen2.5 14B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1088—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.1 (#284), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen2.5 14B Instruct
LMArena Text1110—
LMArena Creative Writing1083—
LMArena Multi-Turn1068—
LiveBench Language12.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better than Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#314); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct or Qwen2.5 14B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 27.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper