Model comparison
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#314); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads 37.7 to 27.9.
Side by side
| Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 38.7 |
| Released | 2024-04-23 | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.35 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.40 |
| Results tracked | 32 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.9 (#318), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: 37.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 39.8% |
| LiveBench Coding | 20.3% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1101 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.2% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.8 (#323), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 15.9% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1100 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 30.3% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | 58.1% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 79.1% | — |
| HellaSwag | 77% | — |
| LiveBench | 24% | — |
| WinoGrande | 81.5% | — |
Math Not comparable
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.6 (#248), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 17.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1151 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 29.1 (#240), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 75.7% | 79.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1067 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 90.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 88% | — |
| TriviaQA | 58.1% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#272), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1058 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1061 | — |
| LMArena French | 1135 | — |
| LMArena German | 1080 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 966 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 894 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1111 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1111 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 51.9 (#292), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 47.2% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1087 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#267), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1088 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.1 (#284), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1110 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1068 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 12.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better than Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#314); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct or Qwen2.5 14B Instruct better for coding?
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 27.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has 3.