Model comparison

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B

Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct scores higher in 2 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads 45.6 to 27.6.

Side by side

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B specifications
Phi 3 Mini 4k InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
ProviderMicrosoftAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index27.933.0
Released2024-04-232024-11-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3514

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#323), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 36.0 (#214)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Coding10931235
LiveBench Coding15.5%—
HumanEval+59.1%—
MBPP+54.2%—

Reasoning Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 14.1 (#328), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 23.9 (#169)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Hard Prompts10721220
Chess Puzzles0%—
LiveBench Reasoning26.8%—
LiveBench Data Analysis34.7%—
Adversarial NLI52.8%—
BIG-Bench Hard71.7%—
HellaSwag76.7%—
LiveBench22.4%—
WinoGrande70.8%—

Math Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#257), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 14.2 (#303)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Math11111242
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—4.4%
LiveBench Math15.7%—
MATH Level 5—42.7%

Knowledge Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 28.5 (#246), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.0 (#264)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
GPQA Diamond—46.3%
LMArena Expert1045—
ARC (AI2) Challenge84.9%—
MMLU68.8%—
OpenBookQA88%—
TriviaQA64%—

Multilingual Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.3 (#280), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 39.9 (#222)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Non-English10211236
LMArena Chinese10211249
LMArena Russian10221246
LMArena French1076—
LMArena German1044—
LMArena Japanese935—
LMArena Korean905—
LMArena Spanish1085—

Instruction Following Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 47.7 (#303), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 64.8 (#227)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Instruction Following10531233
LiveBench Instruction Following39.1%—

Long Context Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#276), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#222)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Longer Query10441224

Writing & Preference Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.6 (#300), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.6 (#223)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Text10731256
LMArena Creative Writing10371231
LMArena Multi-Turn10181252
LiveBench Language9.2%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?

Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?

Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.0 versus 26.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper