Model comparison

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct vs Qwen2-72B

Qwen2-72B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.0 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct Microsoft

27.9

Rank #328 Confirmed

Qwen2-72B Alibaba (Qwen)

30.0

Rank #300 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Qwen2-72B in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in instruction following, where Qwen2-72B leads 61.7 to 47.7.

Side by side

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct and Qwen2-72B specifications
Phi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen2-72B
ProviderMicrosoftAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index27.930.0
Released2024-04-232024-06-07
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3526

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen2-72B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#323), Qwen2-72B: 29.1 (#310)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen2-72B
LMArena Coding10931196
WeirdML—11.3%
BigCodeBench Instruct—38.5%
LiveBench Coding15.5%—
BigCodeBench Complete—54%
HumanEval+59.1%—
MBPP+54.2%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: —, Qwen2-72B: 17.0 (#146)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen2-72B
TheAgentCompany—1.1%
METR Time Horizons—29.9%

Reasoning Qwen2-72B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 14.1 (#328), Qwen2-72B: 23.2 (#181)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen2-72B
LMArena Hard Prompts10721191
Chess Puzzles0%—
LiveBench Reasoning26.8%—
LiveBench Data Analysis34.7%—
Adversarial NLI52.8%—
BIG-Bench Hard71.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—125.28
HellaSwag76.7%—
LiveBench22.4%—
WinoGrande70.8%—

Math Qwen2-72B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#257), Qwen2-72B: 30.2 (#236)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen2-72B
LMArena Math11111235
LiveBench Math15.7%—
MATH Level 5—39.1%

Knowledge Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 28.5 (#246), Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#275)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen2-72B
LMArena Expert10451171
MMLU68.8%82.4%
GPQA Diamond—40.8%
ARC (AI2) Challenge84.9%—
OpenBookQA88%—
TriviaQA64%—

Multilingual Qwen2-72B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.3 (#280), Qwen2-72B: 35.9 (#244)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen2-72B
LMArena Non-English10211176
LMArena Chinese10211240
LMArena French10761170
LMArena German10441151
LMArena Japanese9351111
LMArena Korean9051083
LMArena Russian10221169
LMArena Spanish10851169

Instruction Following Qwen2-72B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 47.7 (#303), Qwen2-72B: 61.7 (#241)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen2-72B
LMArena Instruction Following10531181
LiveBench Instruction Following39.1%—

Long Context Qwen2-72B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#276), Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#235)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen2-72B
LMArena Longer Query10441192

Writing & Preference Qwen2-72B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.6 (#300), Qwen2-72B: 40.8 (#241)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen2-72B
LMArena Text10731203
LMArena Creative Writing10371181
LMArena Multi-Turn10181196
LiveBench Language9.2%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better than Qwen2-72B?

Qwen2-72B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.0 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct or Qwen2-72B better for coding?

Qwen2-72B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.1 versus 26.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct and Qwen2-72B share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.

Related comparisons

Go deeper