Model comparison

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024 vs Qwen3.8 27B

Qwen3.8 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.0 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.8 27B Alibaba (Qwen)

46.0

Rank #68 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.8 27B in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.8 27B leads 65.8 to 29.6.

Side by side

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024 and Qwen3.8 27B specifications
Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024Qwen3.8 27B
ProviderMicrosoftAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index31.346.0
Released—2026-08-14
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—33K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.99
Output $ / M tokens—$1.49
Results tracked1531

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.8 27B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 31.8 (#279), Qwen3.8 27B: 50.5 (#44)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Coding10931482
LMArena WebDev—1593
SciCode—46.6%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: —, Qwen3.8 27B: 32.9 (#57)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024Qwen3.8 27B
APEX-Agents—47.5%

Reasoning Qwen3.8 27B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 20.8 (#231), Qwen3.8 27B: 41.0 (#54)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Hard Prompts10871460
ARC-AGI-2—42.4%
NYT Connections (extended)—54.5%
ARC-AGI-1—87.5%
CritPt—5.4%
DTBench—88%
LMCA—41.4%
Surface Evolver Bench—45%
Epoch Capabilities Index—149.38

Math Qwen3.8 27B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 33.0 (#208), Qwen3.8 27B: 37.1 (#161)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Math11521456
ProofBench—16%

Knowledge Qwen3.8 27B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 28.6 (#244), Qwen3.8 27B: 41.6 (#109)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Expert10511482

Multimodal Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: —, Qwen3.8 27B: 41.3 (#37)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Vision—1271

Multilingual Qwen3.8 27B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 25.9 (#282), Qwen3.8 27B: 53.7 (#60)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Non-English10131430
LMArena Chinese10331504
LMArena German10311438
LMArena Japanese9541384
LMArena Korean8801393
LMArena Russian10191415
LMArena French—1465
LMArena Spanish—1448

Instruction Following Qwen3.8 27B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 54.1 (#282), Qwen3.8 27B: 75.8 (#53)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Instruction Following10581439

Long Context Qwen3.8 27B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 31.7 (#277), Qwen3.8 27B: 44.3 (#70)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Longer Query10421450

Writing & Preference Qwen3.8 27B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 29.6 (#294), Qwen3.8 27B: 65.8 (#43)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text10801441
LMArena Creative Writing10451384
LMArena Multi-Turn10491441
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1671

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024 better than Qwen3.8 27B?

Qwen3.8 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.0 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024 or Qwen3.8 27B better for coding?

Qwen3.8 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.5 versus 31.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024 and Qwen3.8 27B share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024 has 15 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 27B has 31.

Related comparisons

Go deeper