Model comparison

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024 vs Qwen3.5 27B

Qwen3.5 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.5 27B Alibaba (Qwen)

41.9

Rank #127 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 27B in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 27B leads 59.3 to 29.6.

Side by side

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024 and Qwen3.5 27B specifications
Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024Qwen3.5 27B
ProviderMicrosoftAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index31.341.9
Released—2026-02-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$2.40
Results tracked1528

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.5 27B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 31.8 (#279), Qwen3.5 27B: 38.9 (#168)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024Qwen3.5 27B
LMArena Coding10931427
LMArena WebDev—1358
WeirdML—39.5%
ALE-Bench—349.45

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: —, Qwen3.5 27B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024Qwen3.5 27B
Vending-Bench 2—201.98

Reasoning Qwen3.5 27B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 20.8 (#231), Qwen3.5 27B: 27.5 (#117)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024Qwen3.5 27B
LMArena Hard Prompts10871414
NYT Connections (extended)—47.9%
Thematic Generalization—45.5%
DTBench—82.4%
LMCA—34%

Math Qwen3.5 27B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 33.0 (#208), Qwen3.5 27B: 38.8 (#127)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024Qwen3.5 27B
LMArena Math11521429
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—56.7%

Knowledge Qwen3.5 27B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 28.6 (#244), Qwen3.5 27B: 38.0 (#150)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024Qwen3.5 27B
LMArena Expert10511428
Vectara Hallucination Rate—12.1%

Multimodal Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: —, Qwen3.5 27B: 39.4 (#59)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024Qwen3.5 27B
LMArena Vision—1241

Multilingual Qwen3.5 27B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 25.9 (#282), Qwen3.5 27B: 50.8 (#115)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024Qwen3.5 27B
LMArena Non-English10131390
LMArena Chinese10331478
LMArena German10311393
LMArena Japanese9541345
LMArena Korean8801358
LMArena Russian10191390
LMArena French—1410
LMArena Spanish—1407

Instruction Following Qwen3.5 27B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 54.1 (#282), Qwen3.5 27B: 73.5 (#119)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024Qwen3.5 27B
LMArena Instruction Following10581393

Long Context Qwen3.5 27B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 31.7 (#277), Qwen3.5 27B: 43.1 (#106)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024Qwen3.5 27B
LMArena Longer Query10421413

Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 27B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 29.6 (#294), Qwen3.5 27B: 59.3 (#111)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024Qwen3.5 27B
LMArena Text10801409
LMArena Creative Writing10451362
LMArena Multi-Turn10491410

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024 better than Qwen3.5 27B?

Qwen3.5 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024 or Qwen3.5 27B better for coding?

Qwen3.5 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 31.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024 and Qwen3.5 27B share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024 has 15 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 27B has 28.

Related comparisons

Go deeper