Model comparison

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B

Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct scores higher in 2 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads 45.6 to 27.1.

Side by side

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B specifications
Phi 3 Mini 128k InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
ProviderMicrosoftAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index29.733.0
Released2024-04-232024-11-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1914

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 36.0 (#214)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Coding10391235
BigCodeBench Instruct29.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete40.6%—

Reasoning Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 23.9 (#169)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Hard Prompts10281220

Math Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 14.2 (#303)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Math10891242
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—4.4%
MATH Level 5—42.7%

Knowledge Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.0 (#264)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
GPQA Diamond—46.3%
LMArena Expert984—

Multilingual Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 39.9 (#222)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Non-English10001236
LMArena Chinese10161249
LMArena Russian10041246
LMArena French1039—
LMArena German1006—
LMArena Japanese899—
LMArena Korean856—
LMArena Spanish1059—

Instruction Following Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 64.8 (#227)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Instruction Following10231233

Long Context Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#222)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Longer Query9961224

Writing & Preference Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.6 (#223)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Text10501256
LMArena Creative Writing10241231
LMArena Multi-Turn9891252

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?

Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?

Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.0 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper