Model comparison

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.7 vs 30.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct Microsoft

29.7

Rank #305 Confirmed

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct Alibaba (Qwen)

30.1

Rank #297 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads 31.6 to 16.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Instruct: 29.6% for Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct and 45% for Qwen2.5 32B Instruct.

Side by side

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct specifications
Phi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen2.5 32B Instruct
ProviderMicrosoftAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.730.1
Released2024-04-232024-09
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.70
Output $ / M tokens—$2.80
Results tracked197

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.7 (#169)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen2.5 32B Instruct
BigCodeBench Instruct29.6%45%
BigCodeBench Complete40.6%52.3%
LMArena Coding1039—

Reasoning Too close to call

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 19.2 (#266)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen2.5 32B Instruct
Chess Puzzles—0%
LMArena Hard Prompts1028—
Epoch Capabilities Index—128.52

Math Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 16.2 (#296)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen2.5 32B Instruct
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—7.4%
LMArena Math1089—
MATH Level 5—56.1%

Knowledge Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#266)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen2.5 32B Instruct
GPQA Diamond—46.1%
LMArena Expert984—

Multilingual Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen2.5 32B Instruct
LMArena Non-English1000—
LMArena Chinese1016—
LMArena French1039—
LMArena German1006—
LMArena Japanese899—
LMArena Korean856—
LMArena Russian1004—
LMArena Spanish1059—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen2.5 32B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following1023—

Long Context Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen2.5 32B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query996—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen2.5 32B Instruct
LMArena Text1050—
LMArena Creative Writing1024—
LMArena Multi-Turn989—

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.7 vs 30.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper