Model comparison
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.7 vs 30.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads 31.6 to 16.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Instruct: 29.6% for Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct and 45% for Qwen2.5 32B Instruct.
Side by side
| Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 30.1 |
| Released | 2024-04-23 | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.80 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.7 (#169)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29.6% | 45% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.6% | 52.3% |
| LMArena Coding | 1039 | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 19.2 (#266)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1028 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 128.52 |
Math Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 16.2 (#296)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 7.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1089 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.1% |
Knowledge Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#266)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 984 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1016 | — |
| LMArena French | 1039 | — |
| LMArena German | 1006 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 899 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 856 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1004 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1059 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1023 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 996 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1050 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 989 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.7 vs 30.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better for coding?
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.