Model comparison
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#305); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Microsoft
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads 37.7 to 28.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 40.6% for Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct and 52.2% for Qwen2.5 14B Instruct.
Side by side
| Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 38.7 |
| Released | 2024-04-23 | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.35 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.40 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: 37.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29.6% | 39.8% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.6% | 52.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1039 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1028 | — |
Math Not comparable
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1089 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 984 | — |
| MMLU | — | 79.9% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1016 | — |
| LMArena French | 1039 | — |
| LMArena German | 1006 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 899 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 856 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1004 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1059 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1023 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 996 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1050 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 989 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better than Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#305); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct or Qwen2.5 14B Instruct better for coding?
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has 3.