Model comparison
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct vs Qwen1.5-72B
Qwen1.5-72B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
Microsoft
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Qwen1.5-72B in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads 26.8 to 11.5.
Side by side
| Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen1.5-72B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 30.8 |
| Released | 2024-04-23 | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen1.5-72B leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312), Qwen1.5-72B: 31.9 (#277)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29.6% | 33.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1039 | 1165 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.6% | 40.3% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 59.1% |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.6% |
Reasoning Qwen1.5-72B leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256), Qwen1.5-72B: 22.2 (#203)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1028 | 1148 |
Math Qwen1.5-72B leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222), Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#205)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1089 | 1164 |
Knowledge Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254), Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#300)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 984 | 1136 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 28.8% |
Multilingual Qwen1.5-72B leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285), Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#253)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1135 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1016 | 1186 |
| LMArena French | 1039 | 1159 |
| LMArena German | 1006 | 1084 |
| LMArena Japanese | 899 | 1061 |
| LMArena Korean | 856 | 1050 |
| LMArena Russian | 1004 | 1104 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1059 | 1110 |
Instruction Following Qwen1.5-72B leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294), Qwen1.5-72B: 59.3 (#256)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1023 | 1141 |
Long Context Qwen1.5-72B leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289), Qwen1.5-72B: 35.1 (#243)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 996 | 1157 |
Writing & Preference Qwen1.5-72B leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301), Qwen1.5-72B: 37.3 (#258)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1050 | 1166 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | 1137 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 989 | 1160 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better than Qwen1.5-72B?
Qwen1.5-72B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct or Qwen1.5-72B better for coding?
Qwen1.5-72B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.9 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct and Qwen1.5-72B share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-72B has 22.