Model comparison
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct vs Qwen1.5-32B
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Microsoft
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen1.5-32B in 5 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads 30.2 to 13.5.
Side by side
| Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.0 | 30.5 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.9 (#268), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.7 (#282)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1130 | 1155 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.3% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 42% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 21.7 (#214), Qwen1.5-32B: 21.8 (#212)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1127 | 1130 |
Math Too close to call
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.4 (#202), Qwen1.5-32B: 33.0 (#207)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1173 | 1155 |
Knowledge Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.2 (#229), Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#296)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1108 | 1126 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 30.7% |
| MMLU | — | 74.4% |
Multilingual Too close to call
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.6 (#263), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1094 | 1106 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1108 | 1177 |
| LMArena French | 1110 | 1101 |
| LMArena German | 1101 | 1058 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1042 | 1027 |
| LMArena Korean | 954 | 1008 |
| LMArena Russian | 1145 | 1073 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1095 | 1089 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.6 (#268), Qwen1.5-32B: 57.7 (#265)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1113 | 1116 |
Long Context Too close to call
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.0 (#255), Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#246)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1120 | 1146 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.1 (#272), Qwen1.5-32B: 34.2 (#271)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1138 | 1137 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1107 | 1083 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1088 | 1140 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better than Qwen1.5-32B?
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct or Qwen1.5-32B better for coding?
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.9 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct and Qwen1.5-32B share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-32B has 21.