Model comparison
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct vs Qwen-14B
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Microsoft
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen-14B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads 34.1 to 27.6.
Side by side
| Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen-14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.0 | 31.4 |
| Released | — | 2023-09-24 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.9 (#268), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1130 | 1071 |
Reasoning Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 21.7 (#214), Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1127 | 1027 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 113.03 |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |
Math Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.4 (#202), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1173 | 1068 |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.2 (#229), Qwen-14B: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1108 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.3% |
Multilingual Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.6 (#263), Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1094 | 1041 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1108 | 1077 |
| LMArena French | 1110 | — |
| LMArena German | 1101 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1042 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 954 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1145 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1095 | — |
Instruction Following Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.6 (#268), Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1113 | 1031 |
Long Context Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.0 (#255), Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1120 | 1028 |
Writing & Preference Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.1 (#272), Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1138 | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1107 | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1088 | 1022 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better than Qwen-14B?
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct or Qwen-14B better for coding?
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.9 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct and Qwen-14B share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.