Model comparison
Phi-3.5-MoE vs Qwen3.5-9B
Qwen3.5-9B has enough public results to be ranked (#235); Phi-3.5-MoE does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Microsoft
Alibaba (Qwen)Side by side
| Phi-3.5-MoE | Qwen3.5-9B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | — | 33.3 |
| Released | 2024-08-17 | 2026-02-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Phi-3.5-MoE: —, Qwen3.5-9B: 35.3 (#213)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-MoE | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 27.5% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Phi-3.5-MoE: —, Qwen3.5-9B: 14.4 (#143)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-MoE | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 9.2% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Phi-3.5-MoE: —, Qwen3.5-9B: 22.5 (#178)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-MoE | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 12% |
| DTBench | — | 71.2% |
| LMCA | — | 24.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 139.45 |
| PIQA | 88.6% | — |
Math Not comparable
Phi-3.5-MoE: —, Qwen3.5-9B: 33.5 (#174)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-MoE | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 48.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 61.7% |
| GSM8K | 88.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Phi-3.5-MoE: —, Qwen3.5-9B: 46.0 (#77)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-MoE | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 79% |
| BoolQ | 84.6% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi-3.5-MoE better than Qwen3.5-9B?
Qwen3.5-9B has enough public results to be ranked (#235); Phi-3.5-MoE does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Phi-3.5-MoE and Qwen3.5-9B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-3.5-MoE has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-9B has 10.