Noometry

Model comparison

Phi-3.5-MoE vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct

Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#298); Phi-3.5-MoE does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Phi-3.5-MoE Microsoft

—

Unranked

Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct Alibaba (Qwen)

29.4

Rank #298 Confirmed

Side by side

Phi-3.5-MoEQwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
ProviderMicrosoftAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index—29.4
Released2024-08-172024-09
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$2.80
Output $ / M tokens—$8.40
Results tracked36

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Phi-3.5-MoE: —, Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 18.4 (#136)

BenchmarkPhi-3.5-MoEQwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
OSWorld—5%

Reasoning Not comparable

Phi-3.5-MoE: —, Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 20.0 (#228)

BenchmarkPhi-3.5-MoEQwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
Kagi LLM Benchmark—36%
PIQA88.6%—

Math Not comparable

Phi-3.5-MoE: —, Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

BenchmarkPhi-3.5-MoEQwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
GSM8K88.7%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Phi-3.5-MoE: —, Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

BenchmarkPhi-3.5-MoEQwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
BoolQ84.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Phi-3.5-MoE: —, Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 32.9 (#92)

BenchmarkPhi-3.5-MoEQwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
LMArena Vision—1107
Video-MME—73.5%
GeoBench—62%
SpatialViz-Bench—33.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi-3.5-MoE better than Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct?

Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#298); Phi-3.5-MoE does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Phi-3.5-MoE and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-3.5-MoE has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper