Model comparison
Phi-3.5-mini vs Qwen-7B
Neither Phi-3.5-mini nor Qwen-7B has enough public benchmark results to be ranked yet; the rows below show what has been published.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Microsoft
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both.
Side by side
| Phi-3.5-mini | Qwen-7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.9 | — |
| Released | 2024-08-16 | 2023-09-28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 5 | 8 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: 34.6 (#232), Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 32.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 38.5% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: —, Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| PIQA | 81% | 77.9% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 45% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 106.83 |
| LAMBADA | — | 67.9% |
Math Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: —, Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| GSM8K | 86.2% | 51.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: —, Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| BoolQ | 78% | 76.4% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 75.3% |
| MMLU | — | 45% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi-3.5-mini better than Qwen-7B?
Neither Phi-3.5-mini nor Qwen-7B has enough public benchmark results to be ranked yet; the rows below show what has been published.
How many benchmarks do Phi-3.5-mini and Qwen-7B share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-3.5-mini has 5 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-7B has 8.