Model comparison
Phi-3.5-mini vs Pixtral Large
Pixtral Large has enough public results to be ranked (#257); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Microsoft
Mistral AISide by side
| Phi-3.5-mini | Pixtral Large | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 36.4 | 31.7 |
| Released | 2024-08-16 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 5 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: 34.0 (#231), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 32.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 38.5% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: —, Pixtral Large: 20.9 (#208)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.8% |
| PIQA | 81% | — |
Math Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: —, Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| GSM8K | 86.2% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: —, Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| BoolQ | 78% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: —, Pixtral Large: 30.0 (#105)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1089 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: —, Pixtral Large: 32.9 (#273)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 988 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi-3.5-mini better than Pixtral Large?
Pixtral Large has enough public results to be ranked (#257); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Phi-3.5-mini and Pixtral Large share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-3.5-mini has 5 scored results on Noometry and Pixtral Large has 3.