Model comparison

Phi-2 vs Step 1o Turbo 202506

Step 1o Turbo 202506 has enough public results to be ranked (#160); Phi-2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Phi-2 Microsoft

—

Unranked

Step 1o Turbo 202506 StepFun

39.1

Rank #160 Confirmed

Summary

  • Phi-2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Phi-2 and Step 1o Turbo 202506 specifications
Phi-2Step 1o Turbo 202506
ProviderMicrosoftStepFun
Noometry Index—39.1
Released2023-12-12—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1114

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Phi-2: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 38.6 (#158)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-2Step 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Coding—1339
HumanEval+45.1%—
MBPP+54.2%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Phi-2: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 25.7 (#127)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-2Step 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Hard Prompts—1336
Adversarial NLI42.5%—
BIG-Bench Hard59.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index107.62—
HellaSwag53.6%—
WinoGrande54.7%—

Math Not comparable

Phi-2: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 33.9 (#163)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-2Step 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Math—1318

Knowledge Not comparable

Phi-2: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 35.5 (#174)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-2Step 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Expert—1308
ARC (AI2) Challenge75.9%—
MMLU58.4%—
OpenBookQA73.6%—
TriviaQA45.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Phi-2: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 35.4 (#75)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-2Step 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Vision—1186

Multilingual Not comparable

Phi-2: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 45.5 (#168)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-2Step 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Non-English—1313
LMArena Chinese—1380
LMArena German—1315
LMArena Russian—1327

Instruction Following Not comparable

Phi-2: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 69.4 (#171)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-2Step 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Instruction Following—1311

Long Context Not comparable

Phi-2: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 41.1 (#141)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-2Step 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Longer Query—1350

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Phi-2: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 53.4 (#154)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-2Step 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Text—1336
LMArena Creative Writing—1308
LMArena Multi-Turn—1341

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi-2 better than Step 1o Turbo 202506?

Step 1o Turbo 202506 has enough public results to be ranked (#160); Phi-2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Phi-2 and Step 1o Turbo 202506 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-2 has 11 scored results on Noometry and Step 1o Turbo 202506 has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper