Model comparison
Phi-2 vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Qwen3 Coder Next has enough public results to be ranked (#232); Phi-2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Microsoft
Alibaba (Qwen)Side by side
| Phi-2 | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | — | 34.3 |
| Released | 2023-12-12 | 2026-02-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.12 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 11 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Phi-2: —, Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)
| Benchmark | Phi-2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |
| HumanEval+ | 45.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 54.2% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Phi-2: —, Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | Phi-2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Adversarial NLI | 42.5% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 59.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 107.94 | — |
| HellaSwag | 53.6% | — |
| WinoGrande | 54.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Phi-2: —, Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Phi-2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 75.9% | — |
| MMLU | 58.4% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 73.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 45.2% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi-2 better than Qwen3 Coder Next?
Qwen3 Coder Next has enough public results to be ranked (#232); Phi-2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Phi-2 and Qwen3 Coder Next share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-2 has 11 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.