Model comparison

Phi-2 vs Qwen3.5-9B

Qwen3.5-9B has enough public results to be ranked (#235); Phi-2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Phi-2 Microsoft

—

Unranked

Qwen3.5-9B Alibaba (Qwen)

33.3

Rank #235 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.

Side by side

Phi-2 and Qwen3.5-9B specifications
Phi-2Qwen3.5-9B
ProviderMicrosoftAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index—33.3
Released2023-12-122026-02-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.15
Results tracked1110

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Phi-2: —, Qwen3.5-9B: 35.3 (#213)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-2Qwen3.5-9B
SciCode—27.5%
HumanEval+45.1%—
MBPP+54.2%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Phi-2: —, Qwen3.5-9B: 14.4 (#143)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-2Qwen3.5-9B
Terminal-Bench—9.2%

Reasoning Not comparable

Phi-2: —, Qwen3.5-9B: 22.5 (#178)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-2Qwen3.5-9B
Epoch Capabilities Index107.62139.45
CritPt—0.3%
Chess Puzzles—12%
DTBench—71.2%
LMCA—24.5%
Adversarial NLI42.5%—
BIG-Bench Hard59.4%—
HellaSwag53.6%—
WinoGrande54.7%—

Math Not comparable

Phi-2: —, Qwen3.5-9B: 33.5 (#174)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-2Qwen3.5-9B
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—48.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—61.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Phi-2: —, Qwen3.5-9B: 46.0 (#77)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-2Qwen3.5-9B
GPQA Diamond—79%
ARC (AI2) Challenge75.9%—
MMLU58.4%—
OpenBookQA73.6%—
TriviaQA45.2%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi-2 better than Qwen3.5-9B?

Qwen3.5-9B has enough public results to be ranked (#235); Phi-2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Phi-2 and Qwen3.5-9B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Phi-2 has 11 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-9B has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper