Model comparison
Phi-2 vs Qwen1.5-32B
Qwen1.5-32B has enough public results to be ranked (#293); Phi-2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Microsoft
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.
Side by side
| Phi-2 | Qwen1.5-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | — | 30.5 |
| Released | 2023-12-12 | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 11 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Phi-2: —, Qwen1.5-32B: 31.7 (#282)
| Benchmark | Phi-2 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.3% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1155 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 42% |
| HumanEval+ | 45.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 54.2% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Phi-2: —, Qwen1.5-32B: 21.8 (#212)
| Benchmark | Phi-2 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1130 |
| Adversarial NLI | 42.5% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 59.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 107.94 | — |
| HellaSwag | 53.6% | — |
| WinoGrande | 54.7% | — |
Math Not comparable
Phi-2: —, Qwen1.5-32B: 33.0 (#207)
| Benchmark | Phi-2 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1155 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Phi-2: —, Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#296)
| Benchmark | Phi-2 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 58.4% | 74.4% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 30.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1126 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 75.9% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 73.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 45.2% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Phi-2: —, Qwen1.5-32B: 31.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Phi-2 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1106 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1177 |
| LMArena French | — | 1101 |
| LMArena German | — | 1058 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1027 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1008 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1073 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1089 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Phi-2: —, Qwen1.5-32B: 57.7 (#265)
| Benchmark | Phi-2 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1116 |
Long Context Not comparable
Phi-2: —, Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#246)
| Benchmark | Phi-2 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1146 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Phi-2: —, Qwen1.5-32B: 34.2 (#271)
| Benchmark | Phi-2 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1137 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1140 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi-2 better than Qwen1.5-32B?
Qwen1.5-32B has enough public results to be ranked (#293); Phi-2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Phi-2 and Qwen1.5-32B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Phi-2 has 11 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-32B has 21.