Model comparison
Phi-2 vs Qwen Turbo
Qwen Turbo has enough public results to be ranked (#335); Phi-2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Microsoft
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- Phi-2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Phi-2 | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | — | 27.1 |
| Released | 2023-12-12 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 11 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Phi-2: —, Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Phi-2 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| HumanEval+ | 45.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 54.2% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Phi-2: —, Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Phi-2 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Adversarial NLI | 42.5% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 59.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 107.94 | — |
| HellaSwag | 53.6% | — |
| WinoGrande | 54.7% | — |
Math Not comparable
Phi-2: —, Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297)
| Benchmark | Phi-2 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.2% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Phi-2: —, Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272)
| Benchmark | Phi-2 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.8% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 75.9% | — |
| MMLU | 58.4% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 73.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 45.2% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi-2 better than Qwen Turbo?
Qwen Turbo has enough public results to be ranked (#335); Phi-2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Phi-2 and Qwen Turbo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-2 has 11 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.