Model comparison

Phi-1.5 vs Qwen3.5-9B

Qwen3.5-9B has enough public results to be ranked (#236); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Phi-1.5 Microsoft

—

Unranked

Qwen3.5-9B Alibaba (Qwen)

33.8

Rank #236 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.

Side by side

Phi-1.5 and Qwen3.5-9B specifications
Phi-1.5Qwen3.5-9B
ProviderMicrosoftAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index—33.8
Released2023-09-112026-02-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.15
Results tracked710

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Phi-1.5: —, Qwen3.5-9B: 35.9 (#217)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-1.5Qwen3.5-9B
SciCode—27.5%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Phi-1.5: —, Qwen3.5-9B: 14.5 (#151)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-1.5Qwen3.5-9B
Terminal-Bench—9.2%

Reasoning Not comparable

Phi-1.5: —, Qwen3.5-9B: 23.1 (#182)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-1.5Qwen3.5-9B
Epoch Capabilities Index91.53139.46
CritPt—0.3%
Chess Puzzles—12%
DTBench—71.2%
LMCA—24.5%
HellaSwag47.6%—
WinoGrande73.4%—

Math Not comparable

Phi-1.5: —, Qwen3.5-9B: 34.8 (#192)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-1.5Qwen3.5-9B
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—48.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—61.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Phi-1.5: —, Qwen3.5-9B: 46.0 (#84)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-1.5Qwen3.5-9B
GPQA Diamond—79%
ARC (AI2) Challenge44.4%—
BoolQ75.8%—
MMLU37.6%—
OpenBookQA37.2%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi-1.5 better than Qwen3.5-9B?

Qwen3.5-9B has enough public results to be ranked (#236); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Phi-1.5 and Qwen3.5-9B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Phi-1.5 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-9B has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper