Model comparison
Phi-1.5 vs Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
Neither Phi-1.5 nor Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has enough public benchmark results to be ranked yet; the rows below show what has been published.
Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.
Microsoft
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both.
Side by side
| Phi-1.5 | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | — | — |
| Released | 2023-09-11 | 2024-09-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Reasoning Not comparable
Phi-1.5: —, Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Phi-1.5 | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 91.53 | 113.14 |
| HellaSwag | 47.6% | 76.8% |
| WinoGrande | 73.4% | 72.9% |
Math Not comparable
Phi-1.5: —, Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Phi-1.5 | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| GSM8K | — | 86.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Phi-1.5: —, Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Phi-1.5 | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 44.4% | 60.9% |
| MMLU | 37.6% | 68% |
| BoolQ | 75.8% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 37.2% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi-1.5 better than Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)?
Neither Phi-1.5 nor Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has enough public benchmark results to be ranked yet; the rows below show what has been published.
How many benchmarks do Phi-1.5 and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) share?
5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-1.5 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has 6.