Model comparison
Phi-1.5 vs Qwen1.5-72B
Qwen1.5-72B has enough public results to be ranked (#285); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Microsoft
Alibaba (Qwen)Side by side
| Phi-1.5 | Qwen1.5-72B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | — | 30.8 |
| Released | 2023-09-11 | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Phi-1.5: —, Qwen1.5-72B: 31.9 (#277)
| Benchmark | Phi-1.5 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.2% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1165 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.3% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 59.1% |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.6% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Phi-1.5: —, Qwen1.5-72B: 22.2 (#203)
| Benchmark | Phi-1.5 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1148 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 91.53 | — |
| HellaSwag | 47.6% | — |
| WinoGrande | 73.4% | — |
Math Not comparable
Phi-1.5: —, Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#205)
| Benchmark | Phi-1.5 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1164 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Phi-1.5: —, Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#300)
| Benchmark | Phi-1.5 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 28.8% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1136 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 44.4% | — |
| BoolQ | 75.8% | — |
| MMLU | 37.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 37.2% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Phi-1.5: —, Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#253)
| Benchmark | Phi-1.5 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1135 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1186 |
| LMArena French | — | 1159 |
| LMArena German | — | 1084 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1061 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1050 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1104 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1110 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Phi-1.5: —, Qwen1.5-72B: 59.3 (#256)
| Benchmark | Phi-1.5 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1141 |
Long Context Not comparable
Phi-1.5: —, Qwen1.5-72B: 35.1 (#243)
| Benchmark | Phi-1.5 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1157 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Phi-1.5: —, Qwen1.5-72B: 37.3 (#258)
| Benchmark | Phi-1.5 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1166 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1137 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1160 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi-1.5 better than Qwen1.5-72B?
Qwen1.5-72B has enough public results to be ranked (#285); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Phi-1.5 and Qwen1.5-72B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-1.5 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-72B has 22.